3 thoughts on “Darryl, Cocoon, Return to Oz, 1985

  • Avatar
    April 18, 2019 at 8:03 pm
    Permalink

    I love Siskel and Ebert, but they were way off on Return to Oz. Not only were they unfair to the movie, they also didn’t do any in-depth research on the L Frank Baum books at all. Here’s some examples:

    1. Return to Oz were more true to the books than the 1939 classic, despite that film being a great musical.

    2. The reason why the movie wasn’t a lighthearted musical is because director Walter Murch wanted to make a movie that is faithful to the books. It’s no way inspired by then recent special effects films.

    3. This isn’t mentioned here but in both of their Worst Summer Movies of 1985 and Worst of 1985 episodes, Gene keeps calling Tik-Tok a Star Wars rip off. This isn’t true at all, because Tik-Tok is from the books and he looks exactly like he was in the movie.

    Seriously, there’s no excuse for doing so little research. And that’s lazy if you ask me.

    • Avatar
      April 29, 2019 at 9:59 pm
      Permalink

      Roger mentions in his print review that Tik Tok looks ripped off from Star Wars too.

      • Avatar
        April 30, 2019 at 3:37 pm
        Permalink

        I actually know that because I used an emulator of a DOS floppy disk version of Roger Ebert’s Movie Home Companion series on arrchive.org. But it still proves my point that he didn’t do any research on the source material at all. There’s simply no excuse.

Leave a Reply